Genesis of Exit Polls(History, Methodology& Criticism)

Globally:
1930s: The concept of exit polls emerged in the 1930s in the United States, where they were initially conducted by radio stations and newspapers to gather voter sentiment immediately after elections 

1940s: Exit polls gained wider recognition during the 1940s, particularly during the 1948 U.S. presidential election, when they accurately predicted the unexpected victory of Harry S. Truman over Thomas E. Dewey.

1960s: Exit polls became more sophisticated in the 1960s with the introduction of computerized data analysis. This allowed for more accurate and timely projections of election results.

1970s: Exit polls expanded beyond the United States to other countries, including the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia.

In India 
1967: The first exit poll in India was conducted by the Indian Institute of Public Opinion (IIO) during the 1967 general elections.

1970s: Exit polls gained popularity in India during the 1970s, with several organizations conducting them for various elections.
The 1980s: Exit polls faced criticism in India during the 1980s due to inaccuracies and alleged bias.

1990s: Exit polls became more reliable and accurate in the 1990s with the use of improved sampling techniques and data analysis methods.

2000s: Exit polls have become an integral part of the election process in India, providing quick and often accurate projections of election results.


Criticisms of Exit Polls 
Sampling bias: Exit polls rely on a small sample of voters, which may not accurately represent the entire electorate.

Methodological flaws: The methodology used to conduct exit polls can vary, leading to inconsistencies and potentially inaccurate results.

Manipulation and bias: Exit polls can be manipulated to influence voter behavior or favor particular candidates or parties.

Premature projections: Exit polls can sometimes lead to premature projections of election results, which can be misleading and cause unnecessary anxiety among voters.

Examples of Criticisms in India 
2004 general elections: Exit polls predicted a victory for the incumbent National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government, but the actual results showed a win for the Indian National Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA).

2009 general elections: Exit polls again predicted a close race between the NDA and UPA, but the UPA secured a comfortable majority.

2014 general elections: Exit polls predicted a decisive victory for the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which largely materialized. However, the accuracy of exit polls in many states was questioned.

Conclusion 
Exit polls have become a significant tool for predicting election outcomes, but they are not without their limitations.

Concerns about sampling bias, methodological flaws, manipulation, and premature projections raise questions about their reliability and potential impact on voter behavior. 


While exit polls can provide valuable insights into voter sentiment, they should be interpreted with caution and not considered definitive indicators of election results.

Popular posts from this blog

ISSUES IN IMPLEMETING KAVACH SYSTEM ?

ON WHAT FACTORS STATES SHOULD MEASURE THE SUCCESS OF FREE BUS SCHEME FOR WOMEN ? HOW EVIDENCE BASED ADMINISTRATION WILL HELP TO MEASURE IT ?

Criticism on Civic volunteer system in Westbengal & How Politics-Civic volunteer nexus is working in west bengal ?